Election 2011: Mayor comes to WSHS for levy campaign

When Mayor McGinn arrived outside West Seattle High School Wednesday morning to campaign for the Families and Education Levy (Seattle Prop 1 on next Tuesday’s ballot), some of the citywide media swarmed him to ask about a different ballot measure – Seattle Transportation Benefit District Prop 1, which would raise money for transportation projects via $60 added to car tabs. They were following up on Seattle Times (WSB partner) reporter Mike Lindblom‘s story about $400,000 of that money possibly going to revise the Bicycle Master Plan, more than its original cost. Plans change all the time, the mayor was heard to explain. Eventually, the event got back on topic – the levy; specifically, the funding it includes for school-based health centers. That’s what brought a couple of industry executives to join the mayor, including Neighborcare CEOMark Secord:

His company runs clinics at all of West Seattle’s public middle schools and high schools. They offer service beyond what the traditional “school nurse” offers – they run centers that offer services to students including so-called “confidential” care such as mental and reproductive health, as well as vaccinations and other checkups. He says flatly that if the levy loses, those centers close. Photographers were invited into the WSHS clinic after the news conference ended. Physician assistant Auky van Beek was on duty:

The clinic funding has been singled out by levy supporters for months; when we covered the first PTSA meetings of the year at both WSHS and Chief Sealth, we noted that both groups were addressed by the Neighborcare staffers at the respective school health centers, pointing out the levy’s relation to funding their services. A news release following Wednesday’s event said the health funding portion of levy proceeds would total more than $40 million over the measure’s 7-year lifespan.

17 Replies to "Election 2011: Mayor comes to WSHS for levy campaign"

  • JD November 3, 2011 (6:22 am)

    Already voted NO on all the levies and taxes.

  • AE November 3, 2011 (8:01 am)

    Already voted YES on all the levies and taxes.

  • Dcy November 3, 2011 (9:43 am)

    Voted no on all levies and taxes.

  • taxpayer November 3, 2011 (10:28 am)

    no comment

  • M November 3, 2011 (11:44 am)

    Voted Yes on Levy No on prop 1

  • Junctionite November 3, 2011 (1:10 pm)

    Would have voted yes to renew existing levy, but voted no on doubling it. Too many people struggling to pay their mortgages to increase property taxes right now. Come back with a lesser proposal.

  • austin November 3, 2011 (1:55 pm)

    Voting no on taxes then complaing about underfunded government and lack of services – the new american way.

  • pjmanley November 3, 2011 (3:27 pm)

    The mayor and his staff all bicycled to the event, right?

  • pjmanley November 3, 2011 (3:38 pm)

    Fortunately, Seattle voters often support levies and are fairly good at connecting the dots. Unfortunately, City, County, Port and School District take this for granted, and waste precious millions. Sooner or later taxpayers will say “no” and its going to hurt. This may be one of those times.

    Before I pay another dime, I want the exemption for overweight government vehicles repealed. Overweight buses, garbage trucks, fire trucks, street-sweepers, etc. are unnecessarily costing us multiple millions each year, and this has been going on for decades. Drivers and taxpayers are subsidizing this hellish scheme, and the paving industry loves it. All the way to the bank.

  • West Seattleite November 3, 2011 (4:04 pm)

    Voted no. I dislike paying more to subsidize governments that are fiscally irresponsible. The increasing taxes on the middle class are driving more into poverty.

    And I voted no on Prop 1 as well, now is not the time to subisidize a special interest group, which is a very small percentage of the population.

  • John November 3, 2011 (6:15 pm)

    Voted No.

  • silverback November 3, 2011 (7:41 pm)

    I would have voted yes to extend the existing levy, but I will vote no for the increased amount. I have seen my home value fall, energy, electric and water bills go up, my interest income is down and the city council thinks I can afford to pay twice as much for a progam that is marginal at best. The got greedy, and you know what they say; pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered.

  • JN November 3, 2011 (10:00 pm)

    Voted Yes.

  • JL November 4, 2011 (8:38 am)

    I will always vote yes to spend more on our schools.

  • pjmanley November 4, 2011 (10:06 am)

    Shouldn’t car fees & taxes go to car routes, and bike fees & taxes go to bike routes? Why should one group subsidize the other? I drive and bike, and I don’t mind my property taxes being spent on improving neighborhood bike routes, but a $60 fee only on vehicles only, should be spent for the benefit of cars, not bikes. Sorry Mr. Mayor, but such naked money grabs for special interest groups are unfair and offensive on their face. I’d have no problem paying a bike registration fee, and/or donate money for improving bike routes. But folks who don’t bike shouldn’t be forced to pay for benefits to those who do.

  • MP November 4, 2011 (10:19 am)

    How about we vote the mayor right out of office!!!

  • JN November 7, 2011 (1:14 am)

    It’s not really a special interest group when anyone can just hop on a bike and utilize a bike lane or cycle track. In fact, the very nature of a bicycle makes it the least likely to be the defining factor of a group.

Sorry, comment time is over.